The Culture Gap
Last week, I saw a play that was written by an African-American playwright. It dealt with issues of gender, race and identity. It tackled sensitive subjects like sexual abuse and racism. And it was framed around an iconic myth of nature, hope and redemption.
And I hated it.
Not because the play was heavy-handed, unsurprising or obvious (which it was), but because it was being lauded despite these shortcomings. Lauded, I felt, *because* it was a play about a different cultural experience than what the theatregoers in Pittsburgh are used to. In this particular case, I felt quality (or its absence) was being ignored in favor of political correctness -- of the NEED to champion a work of art that presented a less-omnipresent POV than that of the Straight White Male that governs so much of American society.
My continued evaluation of that play, and of my experience with it, have prompted numerous questions over the past week, including:
* Am I unable to connect with art created by artists from different cultural backgrounds because we lack the same shared experiences?
* Does our cultural background directly impact our ability to emotionally or intellectually evaluate art?
* Is mediocre art from underexposed cultures given a "pass" by the cultural gatekeepers simply because they feel obligated to promote any voice from within those cultures that are willing to step forward?
* Does allowing mediocre art to flourish do a disservice to the potential artists from within a specific culture by lowering the bar of expectations?
* Is it fair to compare art from various cultural backgrounds? Is it racist NOT to?
* How profoundly does a difference in gender impact one's ability to understand another?
* What larger cultural or social implications arise when art created for "shock value" ceases to provoke a "shocked" experience in its audience? Does that mean we've diverged too far from a "norm" of behavior, or does it mean we've simply assimilated that previously "extreme" behavior into our larger frame of reference and nullified its impact?
I don't have answers to any of these questions, but I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts.
And I hated it.
Not because the play was heavy-handed, unsurprising or obvious (which it was), but because it was being lauded despite these shortcomings. Lauded, I felt, *because* it was a play about a different cultural experience than what the theatregoers in Pittsburgh are used to. In this particular case, I felt quality (or its absence) was being ignored in favor of political correctness -- of the NEED to champion a work of art that presented a less-omnipresent POV than that of the Straight White Male that governs so much of American society.
My continued evaluation of that play, and of my experience with it, have prompted numerous questions over the past week, including:
* Am I unable to connect with art created by artists from different cultural backgrounds because we lack the same shared experiences?
* Does our cultural background directly impact our ability to emotionally or intellectually evaluate art?
* Is mediocre art from underexposed cultures given a "pass" by the cultural gatekeepers simply because they feel obligated to promote any voice from within those cultures that are willing to step forward?
* Does allowing mediocre art to flourish do a disservice to the potential artists from within a specific culture by lowering the bar of expectations?
* Is it fair to compare art from various cultural backgrounds? Is it racist NOT to?
* How profoundly does a difference in gender impact one's ability to understand another?
* What larger cultural or social implications arise when art created for "shock value" ceases to provoke a "shocked" experience in its audience? Does that mean we've diverged too far from a "norm" of behavior, or does it mean we've simply assimilated that previously "extreme" behavior into our larger frame of reference and nullified its impact?
I don't have answers to any of these questions, but I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts.
Labels: art, culture, people, perception, pop culture, society, sociology, theatre, thought process